controversy flares as rts 1 omits Senegal constitutional revision broadcast

Discussions surrounding the media’s approach to the constitutional revision continue to dominate public discourse in Senegal. On Monday, June 29, 2026, the national public broadcaster, RTS 1, once again found itself under scrutiny after opting not to provide live coverage of the plenary session dedicated to reviewing Bill No. 17/2026, which proposes amendments to the Constitution.

This broadcasting absence immediately fueled a torrent of reactions across social media, with numerous online commentators decrying the editorial choice as selective, even politically motivated. On X (formerly Twitter), a flurry of critical posts emerged within minutes of the parliamentary proceedings commencing.

Some users voiced profound bewilderment at the decision. Others interpreted it as a deliberate tactic to marginalize specific political figures from public debate, particularly concerning the visibility given to interventions related to Ousmane Sonko within institutional media coverage.

Maps Cissé’s account simply relayed, “Plenary Session – Examination of Bill No. 17/2026 on the Revision of the Constitution,” noting the lack of corresponding television broadcast on the public channel. This observation swiftly ignited further public outcry.

Across social platforms, comments fluctuated between weary resignation and outright condemnation. Some internet users remarked that “it’s no longer a surprise,” while others criticized the normalization of such media treatment for significant institutional events. Messages ranged from describing the decision as “unsurprising” to expressing “disappointment” and “persistent incomprehension” regarding the public broadcaster’s role.