Tchad tensions between judges and security minister eased through dialogue
Tchad: easing tensions between judges and security minister
A high-level meeting in N’Djamena sought to resolve rising tensions between magistrates and the Security Minister after remarks sparked controversy. Both sides agreed on steps to restore mutual trust.
A pivotal meeting took place at the Ministry of Justice in N’Djamena on May 27, 2026, aimed at addressing escalating tensions between magistrates and the Minister of Public Security and Immigration. Key figures, including Justice Minister Ndolenodji Alixe Naimbaye and Security Minister Ali Ahmat Aghabache, attended to foster reconciliation.
Ndolenodji Alixe Naimbaye emphasized the necessity of institutional dialogue and maintaining a peaceful environment to uphold the rule of law. Meanwhile, Ali Ahmat Aghabache clarified that his earlier statements—made during a discussion on public land use—had been taken out of context due to manipulated video clips. He vehemently denied any intent to undermine judicial independence and expressed regret over the misrepresentation of his words.
Judicial community reacts to misinterpreted remarks
Union representatives voiced concerns that the Security Minister’s comments could undermine the judiciary’s autonomy. While acknowledging the government’s apology, they requested precise clarifications regarding ambiguous phrasing in his statements.
In response, the Security Minister acknowledged potential ambiguities in his remarks and committed to issuing a formal, unambiguous apology. The First President of the Supreme Court underscored the importance of institutional dialogue to safeguard judicial stability and public trust in the legal system.
Path forward: transparency and institutional trust
Participants agreed to refine the apology letter to eliminate any room for misinterpretation and to release an official statement outlining the reconciliation process. The meeting adjourned with a shared commitment to restoring harmony and reinforcing mutual respect between the judiciary and security sectors.