Digital taxes on phones hinder Cameroon’s tech growth

In the race to digital transformation, Cameroon now faces a paradox. While officials tout ambitious plans for digital economy growth and technological innovation, a new policy threatens to undermine these very goals. The government has introduced a 33.33% tax on mobile phones, applied to their declared value—ranging from 1,670 FCFA for basic models to 135,000 FCFA for premium smartphones. This levy applies simply to owning and using a device within the country’s borders.

This is not digital policy. It is its antithesis.

From ambition to contradiction: taxing what the state claims to promote

The mobile phone has become a vital tool for millions of Cameroonians—not a luxury, but a gateway to opportunity:

  • Students accessing online courses and exams.
  • Small traders managing payments via Mobile Money.
  • Farmers checking market prices in real time.
  • Artisans reaching new clients through WhatsApp.
  • Informal workers accessing public services digitally.

For many, especially in rural and low-income areas, the smartphone is the only bridge to the digital economy. Taxing this bridge is like charging entry to a construction site that the government itself has opened.

It penalizes precisely the people the state claims to empower.

The deeper contradiction: taxing without industry, without alternatives

This policy is even harder to justify given Cameroon’s industrial reality. The country has no domestic phone manufacturing—no assembly plants, no local production, and no announced plans to develop one. Citizens are left with no choice but to import devices, then pay a punitive fee to use them.

There is no substitution, no local alternative, no path to self-sufficiency. There is only a tax on necessity.

Typically, governments tax imports to protect or stimulate local industry. But when there is no industry to protect, and no alternative available, taxation becomes mere extraction—a levy on access itself. That is not economic policy. It is fiscal predation.

What comes next? A slippery slope of digital exclusion

The question must be asked: if smartphones are now taxed at 33.33%, what’s next? Laptops? Tablets? Office equipment?

Each new tax on essential digital tools deepens the divide between those who can participate in the digital economy and those who cannot. It turns a policy meant to build inclusion into one that enforces exclusion—organized digital exclusion.

A connected citizen is a productive citizen. A digitally literate population is the foundation of a competitive economy. This is not speculation—it is a documented reality across Africa and the world.

By making mobile phones more expensive, Cameroon is not just slowing its digital transition—it is surrendering its future. And if the logic extends further, it risks forfeiting any chance of joining the global digital economy at all.

The world moves forward. Cameroon risks falling behind.

Countries that have succeeded in digital transformation did so by lowering barriers to access, not raising them. They invested in connectivity, reduced costs, and prioritized inclusion. Cameroon is doing the opposite.

Rather than taxing phones, the state should be expanding networks, subsidizing access for low-income users, and investing in digital infrastructure. Instead, it is erecting a financial barrier at the very doorstep of opportunity.

This is not just a contradiction. It is a strategic misstep with long-term consequences for education, entrepreneurship, and national competitiveness.

If Cameroon wants to be a leader in digital innovation, it must stop taxing the tools that make it possible.