During a recent debate on the rule of law and political transition in Africa, held on Thursday, August 6, 2026, in Cotonou by the Institute of Justice and Peace Artisans (IAJP/Co), the establishment of Bénin’s Senate sparked a series of constructive exchanges among participants.

Speaking at this significant forum, former minister and parliamentarian Lazare Maurice Sehouéto passionately advocated for the institution, presenting it as an essential tool for bolstering democracy and ensuring political stability within Bénin.

Addressing concerns raised by former deputy Kamel Bio Sika Ouassagari regarding the extent of powers entrusted to the upper chamber, Lazare Maurice Sehouéto emphasized the importance of basing analysis on the nation’s legal texts, rather than succumbing to anticipatory fears or preconceived notions.

According to the seasoned politician, Bénin’s decision to establish a Senate aligns with a broader democratic tradition observed in numerous countries. These nations have historically adopted bicameral systems to effectively navigate periods of institutional fragility and strengthen their governance structures.

Historical precedents illustrating the approach

To substantiate his arguments, Lazare Maurice Sehouéto highlighted several comparative models:

• France: The implementation of the Fifth Republic was a direct response to the ministerial instability that plagued preceding regimes, aiming to create a more robust governmental framework.
• Germany: Following the Second World War, Germany meticulously structured institutional safeguards to protect the rule of law and prevent any potential slide towards authoritarianism.

A call for calm and objective debate

Rejecting any premature judgments or accusations of ulterior motives directed at an institution still in its nascent stages, Sehouéto reiterated that the Senate’s primary objectives are to temper political tensions, foster national unity, and secure the country’s development trajectory.

He concluded his address by urging all political stakeholders and civil society members to engage in rigorous discussions, grounded in objective facts and concrete evidence, rather than relying on caricatures or misrepresentations of the Senate’s intended role.